Monday, 30 November 2009

  • Scott Fenstermaker, the 9/11 Lawyer, Speaks Out


    Scott Fenstermaker has become the lightning rod for 9/11. He is the only defense lawyer mentioned in the upcoming trials of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his four co-conspirators. Although he won't be defending them in court, he's been pilloried by the press for daring to suggest that these detainees have any legal rights.

    I called him this weekend, and asked him why.

    Scott Fenstermaker has represented Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali in various legal proceedings at Guantanamo Bay. Mr. Ali stands accused of conspiracy, murder, destruction of property, hijacking, and terrorism for his part in the September 11th attacks. I could not understand why Mr. Fenstermaker would not defend his client in court, so I began the interview by asking him to clarify this:

    TP: Why won't you represent Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali when he stands trial in New York for the September 11th attacks?

    SF: The government would not let me represent him.

    TP: Why not?

    SF: Well, that's a good question. The government goes crazy every time the detainees want me to represent them, and the government doesn't like it.

    TP: How does the government prevent you from representing the detainees?

    SF: The government wants to control who represents the detainees. The government not only wants to, but it is. The government does this by controlling the judges. The judges are doing exactly what the government wants them to do in these cases. The judges ask what the government wants them to do, and then they do it.

    Mr. Fenstermaker flew to Guantanamo Bay when he found out that Ali and four other detainees would stand trial in Federal Court for the 9/11 attacks. On November 21st he told the New York Times that Mr. Ali and his co-defendants will plead not guilty “so they can have a trial and try to get their message out”. Thus began last week's media circus.

    Bill O'Reilly called him “a weasel” on national television. David Horowitz anointed him a member of the “traitor class”. Even the highbrow Huffington Post accused Mr. Fenstermaker of “bringing his own politics to the case”.

    Sam Stein wrote the hit piece for the Huffington Post. He quoted “an employee with an NGO working on national security issues”. But he did not name this mysterious employee, or the Non-Government Organization.

    Stein's source said that “Fenstermaker was causing a lot of trouble and was in no way qualified to be representing these guys but had managed to set up a relationship with these detainees". I read parts of Stein's essay to Mr. Fenstermaker, and he had no doubt about the NGO.

    TP: Who is the Non Government Organization?

    SF: The American Civil Liberties Union. They're working with the government and the judges involved in the cases. The detainees know that the government appointed counsel is working to prosecute.

    TP: You mean their Government appointed legal defenders would be working to convict them?

    SF: Yes, that's why they've rejected assigned counsel.

    TP: Is that why they are going to represent themselves at trial?

    SF: Yes.

    We spoke at length about the ACLU's collusion with the US Government to convict these men. In my opinion, this is why the Obama administration is so confident these alleged 9/11 conspirators will be convicted and sentenced to death. Since they will be representing themselves, the trial will be a sham, a show for the American People.

    I asked Scott Fenstermaker a final series of questions to clarify his legal representation of Mr. Ali and the other defendants at the upcoming trial.

    TP: Did you ask Mr Ali if you could represent him at the trial in New York?

    SF: No.

    TP: Do you plan to ask Mr Ali if you could represent him?

    SF: No.

    TP: What if Mr. Ali or one of the other defendants asks you to defend them in court?

    SF: I would refuse to do it.

    TP: Why?

    SF: Because I think the international community may one day open up a war crimes investigation into the war on terror, and a lot of these judges and lawyers may be prosecuted themselves.

    SF: It's illegal, what we're doing with these detainees.

    ...


Friday, 20 November 2009

  • No World Order

    Today the US dollar is the world’s reserve currency. That means many necessary commodities, including oil, are priced exclusively in dollars. Since every nation that conducts trade must accumulate dollars, our currency maintains its value.

    The world has to buy our money.

    That’s how we finance our massive trade and budget deficits. This has allowed us to live well beyond our means for a generation, wage our wars, and avoid the consequences of our dysfunctional economy. If the US dollar were not the de facto global currency, our present economic debacle would be much worse.

    Wall Street’s implosion has created the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression. Yet the Obama administration has not been forced to drastically raise taxes and cut spending. The US Treasury Department and Federal Reserve have simply printed trillions to cover the losses.

    The rest of the world has watched in disgust as our financial firms were bailed out with what amounts to the world’s money.

    The recent G-20 summit was part public facade, where such niceties as global warming were discussed. Behind closed doors, the real issue was the stability of the dollar. The world’s reserve currency has lost 15 percent of its value this year, and there is a very real prospect of a dollar devaluation.

    Russia’s Central Bank has abandoned the dollar as a reserve currency in favor of the euro. China’s Ministry of Finance held their first auction of treasury bonds on September 28th. These bonds denominated in yuan will allow China’s currency to trade internationally.

    Robert Zoellick, the President of the World Bank, issued a warning after China’s latest move: “The United States would be mistaken to take for granted the dollar’s place as the world’s predominant reserve currency. Looking forward, there will increasingly be other options to the dollar”.

    Then the financial world was roiled by Robert Fisk, a journalist for The Independent. According to him, Economic ministers from China, Russia, Japan and France have been secretly negotiating with OPEC “to end dollar dealings for oil”. His news report sent gold prices soaring to record highs, and put more downward pressure on the dollar.

    These recent events illustrate how precarious the dollar’s status as the world’s currency is. But this begs a question: How far will our regime go to defend this petrodollar monopoly?

    The United States has suddenly taken a much more belligerent stance against Iran. The Obama administration is scrambling to get new sanctions passed, and even threatening war. Why?

    Because Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ordered his country to conduct all oil trade in euros on September 12, that’s why. His executive decree also shifted the nation’s $80 billion in foreign exchange reserves from dollars to euros. Our confrontation with Iran has less to do with their nuclear program than with saving the dollar.

    On September 15, just three days later, the Bipartisan Policy Center issued this statement:

    If biting sanctions do not persuade the Islamic Republic to demonstrate sincerity in negotiations and give up its enrichment activities, the White House will have to begin serious consideration of the option of a U.S.-led military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.”

    On September 24, President Obama chaired a meeting of the United Nations Security Council. During his opening remarks he issued the following grim warning:

    “Just one nuclear weapon exploded in a city — be it New York or Moscow, Tokyo or Beijing, London or Paris — could kill hundreds of thousands of people, and it would badly destabilize our security, our economies and our very way of life”.

    The next day Obama addressed the G-20 summit in Pittsburgh. But he did not discuss the economy or the plummeting dollar. Instead, the President revealed a previously undisclosed nuclear facility near Qom, Iran.

    Yesterday in Vienna, the United States, the United Kingdom and France presented detailed evidence to the IAEA demonstrating that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been building a covert uranium enrichment facility near Qom for several years.”

    This was not precisely true. Iran had notified the International Atomic Energy Agency of a new “pilot facility” just days prior to Obama’s U.N. Speech. This notification was in accordance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty, so the site was not illegal or even clandestine.

    After declaring Qom a sinister nuclear threat to the world, Obama called on the U.N. to enact tougher sanctions against Iran, specifically targeting the oil-rich nation’s “energy sector”.

    Obama’s grandstanding before the U.N. Security Council reminded many of Colin Powell’s infamous speech. As Secretary of State, Powell had briefed the U.N. on Iraq’s mythical weapons of mass destruction, complete with bogus intelligence reports and even fake diagrams. His diatribe helped convince the Security Council to back the US invasion of Iraq.

    Of course Powell was lying. There were no WMDs in Iraq, they were an excuse used by the neo-cons to justify the war. The truth was, Saddam Hussein had ordered his country to conduct all oil trade in euros, just as Iran has done.

    The Obama administration has failed to impose new sanctions on Iran through the U. N., which means they’ve failed to stop Iran’s oil trade in euros.

    What they have done is unite Iran’s trade allies in a common cause; dethroning the dollar. Several state-run Chinese companies are already purchasing Iranian oil with euros, and supplying Iran with gasoline in return. Turkey is switching to national currencies in trade with Iran and China, ending dependence on the U.S. Dollar.

    On October 26, the Iranian Oil Bourse opened as a new market for oil trade on the Persian Gulf island of Kish. According to the Tehran Times:

    The oil bourse is intended as an exchange market for petroleum, gas, and petrochemicals in various currencies, primarily the euro and Iranian rial, and a basket of other major currencies.

    Just two days later, the United States pressed ahead with unilateral sanctions in an attempt to curtail this trade. The US Congress has passed the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act, (IRPSA). This bill prohibits firms that supply Iran with petroleum products from doing business in the United States.

    Congressman Howard Berman declared that; “Iran, the leading state sponsor of terrorism, will be prevented from acquiring the capacity to produce nuclear arms.”

    Understandably, the Iranians are infuriated. Congress has the nerve to accuse Iran of terrorism, while US troops are waging two illegal wars in countries bordering theirs. They have granted U.N. inspectors access to Qom, begun negotiations with the U.N. in Vienna, and even tentatively agreed to export most of their enriched uranium.

    Last week IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei briefed the New York Times about Qom:

    It’s a hole in a mountain… nothing to be worried out”. “The idea was to use it as a bunker under the mountain to protect things.”

    This whole business of enrichment is a non-issue anyway because Iran has only 1600 kilograms of low-enriched uranium, unsuitable for an atomic bomb. Even if the Iranians had weapons-grade uranium, they could not make it into a bomb under the auspices of the IAEA. Iran simply cannot produce a nuclear weapon.

    The only nation in the Middle East that has nuclear weapons is our psychotic ally, Israel. The Jewish state reserves the right to launch a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure at any time. This from a country that refuses to allow U.N. Inspectors access to their arsenal, or sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

    Although nothing is official, there are unconfirmed reports that Israel already plans to attack Iranian nuclear targets after Christmas. According to the French weekly Le Canard Enchaine, the Israeli Chief of Staff Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi has secretly briefed his counterparts from The United states and France on Israel’s war plans.

    Ephraim Sneh, a former Israeli deputy defense minister, told London’s Sunday Times;

    “If no crippling sanctions are introduced by Christmas, Israel will strike.” “If we are left alone, we will act alone.”

    The Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Michael Mullen, has stated that a nuclear armed Iran would pose an existential threat to Israel. During a briefing in Washington, the Admiral also implied that US naval and air forces could be involved in an Israeli assault. Even if the United States does not join in, they would certainly provide intelligence and logistic support.

    Israel and the United States have just concluded their largest ever joint military exercises. The Israelis want US backing to crush Iran’s nuclear ambitions, while the US is desperate to halt Iran’s oil trade in euros. That’s why we are probably going to war with Iran, and probably sooner rather than later.

    The American oligarchy is playing a very dangerous game, risking another war in the Middle East to save the US dollar. They’ve already destroyed Iraq and Afghanistan, killing at least a half-million people. And they’ve spent the world’s money doing it.

    Americans do not pay for the trillion-dollar security apparatus that wages these global wars. It’s the Chinese, Middle Eastern banks, and Sovereign Wealth Funds who buy our debt. If they want to conduct trade, they have no choice but to finance this war machine.

    Since the financial crisis began, the United States has flooded global markets with trillions of dollars worth of US Treasuries. Nobody wants them, and soon the world won’t have to buy them. The only question is, will our empire collapse before we start another war.

Monday, 02 May 2005

  • The Third Depression

    © A. Scott Piraino

    The US economy as we know it will soon collapse. This has happened before, twice, and history is about to repeat itself again. This will be the third depression the United States has suffered, and it will probably be the worst.

    In the Gilded Age of the 1890’s, and the Roaring 1920’s, improvements in technology and industry fueled rapid economic expansions. Capitalism was revered as the new engine of progress, while onerous government regulations were seen as an impediment to growth. These were days of “laissez faire” economics and unscrupulous robber barons.
        
    Inevitably there was a growing disparity in incomes, but the majority of Americans were more concerned with getting rich than helping the poor. Most investors believed these economic booms would last forever, but this optimism proved to be their undoing as exuberance bid up share prices. Inevitably the day came when prices fell, and our markets collapsed.

    The Gilded Age ended with a monetary crisis in the first decade of the twentieth century. Incoming President Teddy Roosevelt was forced to borrow money from wealthy elites to finance the government. The Roaring Twenties ended in a more spectacular fashion, a stock market crash in 1929 ushered in the Great Depression.

    Depressions are created when money disappears. People suddenly become poorer, and they spend less money. With less demand for goods and services, production declines and prices fall, causing a downward spiral of unemployment and falling incomes.

    Our country has endured deflationary periods after numerous boom and bust cycles, most notably during the Great Depression. But the coming collapse will be different. Debt, and our dependence on imported oil and manufactured goods are the reasons the Third Depression will be different, and much worse.

    The U.S. budget deficit climbed to a record high $412 billion last year, which was surpassed by our trade deficit of $496 billion, also a new record. This year’s deficits will be even larger. The Bush administration has projected a budget deficit of $390 billion for the year, not including $80 billion for the war in Iraq. Meanwhile our trade deficit is growing even faster, at an annual rate of $592 billion.

    To finance our current account deficit, we have to import three billion dollars in cash, every working day. Our deficits now consume 80 percent of the entire world’s net savings, and our demand for debt is increasing. This is unsustainable.

    Interest rates on our national debt are low only because bondholders are confident in our ability to make payments. The US dollar maintains its value on world markets because foreign nations believe we can afford our appetite for imported goods. As our economy falters and our deficits rise, the world is losing faith in our ability to finance our deficits.

    This is why world markets are beginning to reject the US dollar. The dollar has lost about one third of its value against other major currencies since 2002, and has been falling at a much faster rate in recent months. The danger of course is that as the dollar declines in value, it becomes less profitable to hold, and the incentive to sell dollars increases.

    If enough central banks and foreign investors began unloading US assets, other investors and financial institutions would see the dollar rapidly losing value. They would have to sell their US securities quickly, to protect themselves from further losses on their dollar denominated holdings. There would be a financial panic, and the US dollar would collapse.

    This danger is very real, and our declining dollar is creating a vicious cycle which will inevitably cause our currency to depreciate more. As our dollar loses value, foreign goods purchased with dollars become more expensive. Since we are now dependent on imported goods, (see the trade deficit figures above), our shrinking dollar means higher prices for those goods.

    In addition to the inflation caused by rising prices for imported wares, we have to worry about oil. The price of oil is skyrocketing even faster than the value of our dollar is falling, rising 30% in the last three months alone. As of this writing the price of oil has reached 50 dollars a barrel, and gasoline prices nationally are at a record high $2.11 at the pump.

    These market forces are putting immense pressure on our economy. Higher costs for energy and transportation have been driving up prices at a 3% annual rate. Last month the Consumer Price Index jumped 0.6 %, the largest increase in four years, even when rising prices for food and energy are excluded.

    While inflation is gaining momentum, recent economic reports and corporate earning statements show an economy rapidly losing steam. General Motors reported a net loss of over one billion dollars in their most recent quarter. U.S. durable goods orders plummeted by 2.8 percent in March, while new housing starts plunged 17.6 percent, marking their steepest drop in more than 14 years.

    Even more telling is a report prepared by the Economic Policy Institute on April 21st. The report shows that wages and salaries as a share of national income fell to their lowest levels on record, even lower than the Great Depression of 1929. Although corporate profits are at all time highs, wages, (which represent total income for 80% of Americans), have not kept pace with inflation.

    The US economy may be expanding as government statistics claim, but the majority of Americans are actually getting poorer. US household debt now stands at $10 trillion, ( a record high, of course), and has been increasing by over one trillion dollars per year since 2002. Americans cannot spend enough money to lift the economy out of the doldrums, nor can they afford higher prices, or higher interest rates.

    The trembling dollar, inflation jitters, and pessimistic economic data sent all three US stock indexes to their lows for the year in April. The Dow Jones declined by 3 percent, the tech-heavy Nasdaq dropped by 4 percent, while the S&P 500 lost 2 percent. The market is waiting for the other shoe to drop, and in April the warnings became more shrill.

    In testimony before Congress two weeks ago, Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan warned that “these deficits would cause the economy to stagnate or worse“.

    He’s right, and he knows our economic problems are even worse than our deficits, a declining dollar, and inflation. Derivatives are financial holdings that derive their value from other securities. These new financial instruments have created a speculative bubble unlike anything ever seen, and pose a mortal danger to our economy.

    In a letter to shareholders, billionaire investor Warren Buffet warned that derivatives were “time bombs, both for the parties that deal in them and the economic system“. He went on to explain how derivatives work, and why they are so dangerous:

    “Essentially, these instruments call for money to change hands at some future date, with the amount to be determined by one or more reference items, such as interest rates, stock prices or currency values. If, for example, you are either long or short an S&P 500 futures contract, you are a party to a very simple derivatives transaction -with your gain or loss derived from movements in the index.”

    “Unless derivatives contracts are collateralized or guaranteed, their ultimate value also depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparties (sic) to them. In the meantime, though, before a contract is settled, the counterparties record profits and losses -often huge in amount- in their current earnings statements without so much as a penny changing hands.”

    In 1986, the global market for derivatives stood at just over one trillion dollars. By 2004, The U.S. Comptroller of the Currency estimated the value of derivatives held by U.S. commercial banks at around $84 trillion. That’s eight times the size of the US economy.  

    Derivatives are now one of the pillars of our financial system. Fannie Mae, a federally subsidized home-mortgage corporation, has recently admitted to $8.4 billion dollars in losses stemming from derivatives. JP Morgan Chase has $43 trillion in derivatives contracts, by far the largest portfolio of any commercial bank.

    The implosion of one of our banks or lending agencies due to losses on derivatives would cause a panic, and wipe out the US economy. And the fact is, many of our financial institutions are only solvent as long as their derivative holdings are profitable. This situation is now very dangerous because 87% of derivative positions consist of interest rate contracts.

    Alan Greenspan is trapped, and he knows it. The Federal Reserve must raise interest rates to improve the rate of return on dollar investments, and keep foreign investors from abandoning the US currency. But higher interest rates will slow down the already moribund US economy, and create immense losses on derivative contracts.

    Monetary policy cannot save us from an impending financial reckoning caused by our soaring levels of debt and speculation. The only people who can get us out of our economic difficulties are the very people who have put us in this mess. Yet the Bush administration appears to be blithely marching the United States over the brink of an economic abyss.

    After the economic crises following the Gilded Age and Roaring Twenties, there was a backlash against the excesses of capitalism. Teddy Roosevelt reined in monopolies, and passed the first income tax into law. During the Great Depression, Franklin D. Roosevelt raised taxes on the wealthy to finance his New Deal legislation.

    Unfortunately, we don’t have a Roosevelt in office to champion the majority against business interests. President Bush has repeatedly cut taxes for our wealthiest citizens, and signed more free trade agreements, while our deficits have soared. He and his cronies have offered nothing but the same warmed over Reaganomics that created our trade and budget deficits in the first place. 

    If the US Government does not take drastic action immediately to reduce our deficits and increase investment in the US economy, one or more of the following scenarios will take place:

    1) The dollar’s value will depreciate until enough investors and foreign central banks decide to unload our currency, causing a financial panic.
    2) Higher interest rates will cause multi-billion dollar losses in derivatives trading, and when a financial institution admits to the scale of those losses, there will be a financial panic.
    3) Too many Americans foreclose on variable-rate mortgages and credit card debts, causing a default in a bank or lending agency, and a financial panic.
    4) Fearing any of the above eventualities, US and global stock markets melt down as investors liquidate their holdings, causing a financial panic.

    Either way, the house of cards that Reaganomics built will soon collapse. We have a right to be angry about the economic catastrophe we are about to experience, but we have no right to be surprised. This is the Third Depression after all.   


        


Wednesday, 24 November 2004

  • The Original Thanksgiving

    © A. Scott Piraino

    When most Americans think of the origins of Thanksgiving, images of Pilgrims, the Mayflower, and feasts with Indians come to mind. That is not true. The Thanksgiving holiday we celebrate today originated in 1864, the bloodiest year in US history.

    The Civil War had been raging for nearly four years. Over half a million soldiers were dead in what was by far the biggest war on earth up to that time. In 1864, the American people had to choose whether to end the war and dissolve the United States, or continue the carnage and hope for victory.

    The Army of the Potomac had borne the brunt of the fighting, and had usually lost to the dashing Robert E. Lee. Bull run, The Peninsula Campaign, Fredericksburg, and Chancellorsville had been debacles for the Union Army. Only Antietam and Gettysburg could be called victories, and these battles were won because the Union held their ground, not by outmaneuvering the wily Confederates.

    In the summer of 1864 command of all Union Armies passed to Ulysses S. Grant. His grim strategy was to engage the Confederate armies in a relentless war of attrition. To that end, the Union Army under Grant fought a series of battles in Virginia. The Army of the Potomac suffered 66,000 thousand casualties in six weeks, losing over half their strength.

    Out west, Sherman’s Army faced equally stubborn Confederates in a battle for Atlanta. In the Shenandoah valley, another Confederate Army was marching towards Washington. In total, Union Army casualties in the summer of 1864 surpassed 100,000.

    The press and public were horrified. President Lincoln was criticized for his conduct of the war, and his insistence that slavery, and the confederacy, be destroyed before the war could end. With the Presidential election just four months away, the prospects for President Lincoln, and the United States, appeared bleak.

    Lincoln’s opponent in the election was George McClellan. A former Union Army General who was responsible for some of the bungled campaigns of the previous years. He promised an immediate end to the war, and negotiations with the Confederacy. Had he won, the United States would not exist.

    On August 23rd, President Lincoln wrote, “it seems exceedingly probable that this Administration will not be re-elected. Then it will be my duty to so cooperate with the President-elect as to save the Union between the election and the inauguration; as he will have secured his election on such grounds that he cannot possibly save it afterwards."

    Then on September 3rd, Sherman captured Atlanta. Two weeks later a Union Army took the offensive in the Shenandoah valley. After three victories, the Shenandoah valley, breadbasket of the Confederacy, was in Union hands.

    Although the Army of the Potomac did not win any decisive victories in the summer of 1864, their sacrifice had finally besieged Lee’s Army. The most infamous Confederate army was entrenched at Petersburg, unable to move. The South now had no chance to defeat the Union in the field, and change the course of the election.

    After two months of campaigning, what had been a futile war with no end in sight suddenly appeared to be all but over. The reversal of fortunes was astounding. By October of 1864, it was clear that the Union would win the Civil War. That November, the American people voted to re-elect President Lincoln,and pursue the war to it's conclusion.

    Grateful for the victories that had saved the United States, Abraham Lincoln declared the last Thursday in November to be a national day of Thanksgiving.

    Our country is being brought to the brink of another abyss by our cynical, corrupt leaders. Americans have survived tough times before, and we will suffer through the events of the near future. When we do let us give thanks.

    ...

Sunday, 14 November 2004

  • A House Divided...

    © A. Scott Piraino

    Exit polls show that “moral values“ won the election for Bush. The Republicans succeeded in distracting us from real, pressing issues, and making November 2nd a referendum on the new “culture war“. Basically, the American people re-elected George W. Bush because he is a conservative.

    But he‘s certainly not a fiscal conservative, his administration has ran record trade and budget deficits. Nor is he politically conservative, enforcing a literal interpretation of the Constitution, (the Patriot Act is proof of that). No, George Bush has cast himself as a moral conservative, standing against liberals who seek to change our culture and way of life.

    “Liberal“ literally means generous, or giving. Democrats believed that redistribution of wealth was right and necessary, and raised taxes, (predominantly on the wealthy), to pay for these social programs. They supported the Unions that forced capitalists to equitably share profits with workers.

    Franklin D. Roosevelt created Social Security, and Lyndon B. Johnson gave us Medicare, Welfare, and the Civil Rights Amendment. Unfortunately, the days when Democrats thought big, and proposed legislation that benefited the working class are gone. The American people may still be liberal at heart, but they do not subscribe to the fringe issues that are passed off as Democratic values today.

    This new liberalism goes by many names; multiculturalism, diversity, but it is most aptly described as being “politically-correct“. This movement is not one single issue, rather it is a way of thinking that seeks to force a left-wing ideology onto the majority. Anyone who disagrees with this ideology or dares to speak out can simply be branded as right-wing, extremist, or a bigot.

    Our police officers are accused of racism when they “profile“ groups of blacks. Even though everyone knows black males commit the majority of violent crimes in this country, and the statistics prove it. This fact just isn’t discussed, because it’s not politically correct.

    Most Americans oppose illegal immigration, and they resent immigrants for committing crimes, drawing welfare, using public funds for education and health care, and competing with citizens for jobs. But again, no one speaks out against illegal immigration because Republicans want cheap labor, and Democrats want votes. There are an estimated eight to twelve million people living in the United States illegally, yet the issue is simply not up for public debate.

    In the recent election, the moral issue that was used to split the electorate was gay marriage. Middle America does not approve of gay marriage, but they are more offended by the gay community‘s whining about being oppressed when they don‘t get it. Again, anyone who criticizes the gay community’s endless lawsuits and courtroom theater is simply politically incorrect.  

    Right wing pundits like Rush Limbaugh, Bill O‘Reilly, and Ann Coulter have made careers out of lambasting the excesses of the American left. These new pundits are not content to rail about old school conservative issues like gun control or abortion. In their view every perceived problem; from big government, rampant crime, ivory tower professors, civil-rights extremists, violence on television, and even our self-centered, hip hop culture is caused by…liberals, (who are of course Democrats).

    These right wing pundits are very popular on television, radio, and the internet simply because many people share their views. The fact is, the majority of Americans distain these false liberals and their left-wing causes. And they disagreed with this politically correct agenda strongly enough to re-elect George Bush on November 2nd.

    Unfortunately, Middle America has made a terrible mistake, because George Bush is not a conservative, he is a thief and a liar.

    Now the President is free to carry out his real agenda, and with Republican majorities in both houses of Congress, he just might pull it off. Already the Bush administration is proposing the privatization of Social security, more energy de-regulation, the rollback of conservation laws, and of course more tax cuts. Whether you call it the social safety net or the welfare state, the Republicans are preparing to dismantle it.

     The next Bush administration is not going to prevent gay marriage, curb illegal immigration, censor the decadent media, or rationalize the racial profiling of black Americans. But they are going to destroy the core Democratic ideal of redistribution of wealth for the benefit of the majority. Seriously, with our budget deficits and these crooks in office, cuts in Social Security, Medicare, and other basic subsidies to middle class Americans are on the table.

    The real irony, the real tragedy of this election is that Middle America, represented by the “Red States“ that voted for George bush, has suffered the worst from Republican politics. Their blue collar jobs have been shipped overseas, (Ohio is in the middle of the rust belt after all), and agri-business has destroyed the small farmers. Since they are poorer, they are more dependent on the very Federal subsidies that Bush Inc. intends to cut.

    While the “Blue States” that voted Democratic have benefited from Republican policies. Their incomes have climbed above the national average, they are better educated, and they have lower unemployment rates than Middle America. They are also wealthier, and would have paid higher taxes in a Kerry administration to support programs that benefited their poorer countrymen.

    The culture war has turned American politics upside down. Those who benefit from the Republican agenda vote Democrat, those who lose vote Republican. In addition, the Bush administration has not been forced to answer for their real performance during the last four years.  

    The United States now runs trade and budget deficits of over $400 billion a year each. There are one million fewer jobs in the US today than when Bush took office in 2000, and per capita incomes have declined. President Bush failed to capture Osama bin Laden or destroy al-Qaeda, yet one third of our army is fighting in Iraq because the President lied about WMDs to put them there.

    And they got away with it by hyping the excesses of a few too-far-left liberals, and using the September 11th attacks to justify the War in Iraq. Simply put;  Middle America was manipulated by an alliance of right-wing conservatives and cynical Republicans. They‘ve been duped, and now they will be discarded.



ThePopulist

  • Visit ThePopulist's Xanga Site
    • Name: Scott
    • Birthday: 12/11/1965
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 5/11/2003

Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

Recommended

[no recommendations]

Blogrings

[no blogrings]